跳到主要內容

From Silicon Valley to Europe, Why Are Enterprises Turning to Chinese AI Models? The Cost-Performance Revolution Is Rewriting Tech Rules

One-line conclusion: Twenty of the world's top 50 most-used AI models now come from China, and in June Chinese model token usage was 85% higher than US models—companies like DoorDash, Siemens, and Airbnb are switching to Chinese AI driven by costs 5-10x lower and capabilities rapidly catching up.

Think the AI race is only about American winners? The reality might surprise you.

According to a viral post by financial analyst Kobeissi Letter (over 266,000 views, 1,500 likes), a startling data point emerged:

Of the world's top 50 most-used AI models, 20 come from China—up 400% since 2025. During the same period, US models fell from 33 to 28.

Even more dramatic: in June, Chinese model token usage reached 98 trillion, a 113% month-over-month increase. US model usage was 53 trillion, up 43%. Chinese model usage is now 1.85x that of US models—and in May, it was only 1.24x.

Kobeissi Letter data: Chinese models surpass US models in both count and token usage among the world's top 50 AI models

Who's Using Chinese AI?

This isn't fringe experimentation. Globally recognized enterprises are adopting Chinese AI models at scale:

  • DoorDash: The delivery giant uses DeepSeek models to reduce AI costs
  • Siemens: Industrial powerhouse integrates Chinese AI into production optimization systems
  • Airbnb: The booking platform uses Chinese models to improve search and recommendation algorithms

The Financial Times reported that these companies are drawn to Chinese AI for a straightforward reason: cheaper, increasingly capable, and easier to run on their own infrastructure.

Financial Times report: From Silicon Valley to Europe, enterprises turn to Chinese AI to cut costs

The Cost-Performance Revolution

Why aren't companies sticking with OpenAI, Google, or Anthropic?

The answer is simple: money.

US frontier AI model API prices have been climbing steadily. The cost per call for GPT-4 and Claude, when multiplied by billions of requests for enterprises, becomes astronomical.

By contrast, DeepSeek and other Chinese models cost 5 to 10 times less. More importantly, their capabilities are closing rapidly.

OpenRouter, a platform that tracks LLM token usage, shows Chinese models surpassed US competitors in token consumption this year. This isn't just about being cheap—if the quality were terrible, enterprises wouldn't use them.

Ali Ghodsi, co-founder of Databricks, shared a surprising finding on Twitter: in internal benchmarking across 11,000 employees and three hyperscalar clouds, the Chinese model GLM 5.2 performed "exceptionally well."

His tweet received over 416,000 views and 1,500 likes.

The Geopolitical Complexity

This shift carries particular sensitivity in Europe.

Last month, the Trump administration imposed export controls on Anthropic's Mythos and Fable models. This move forced European businesses to confront a fundamental question: what are the risks of depending solely on American AI technology?

Tech observer @andre_banandre noted that 46% of enterprise AI token traffic now runs on Chinese models. DeepSeek alone outpaces Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI individually.

This isn't an ideological choice—it's an economic one. When the cost difference is 10x and the quality gap is narrowing, it's hard for businesses to resist.

CoinBureau report: Global enterprises turn to Chinese AI to reduce costs

What Does This Mean?

For the Tech Industry

  • US AI giants' pricing power is being challenged—if a Chinese model delivers 80-90% of the quality at 10-20% of the cost, what would enterprises do?
  • Open-source AI is becoming mainstream—Chinese models' advantage partly comes from open-source strategies, allowing enterprises to run models on their own servers without worrying about API limits or data leakage

For Investors

  • Chinese AI company valuations may be severely underestimated
  • US AI giants may face long-term margin pressure

For Everyday Readers

  • AI is becoming more democratized—no longer just US tech companies holding the technology
  • Lower costs mean more businesses can use AI to improve efficiency, potentially benefiting consumers

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Are Chinese AI models really better than US ones?

A1: Not "better"—but "better value." In many tasks, Chinese models deliver 80-90% of US model quality at 10-20% of the cost. For enterprise applications that don't need top-tier capability, this is extremely attractive.

Q2: What is DeepSeek?

A2: DeepSeek is a Chinese AI company known for its high cost-performance language models. Its models are widely used on platforms like OpenRouter, and token consumption has surpassed most US competitors this year.

Q3: How is the US government responding?

A3: The Trump administration imposed export controls on some Anthropic models last month. Ironically, this accelerated European companies' diversification—if US tech has supply risks, why not diversify?

Q4: Is the 46% enterprise AI token figure on Chinese models accurate?

A4: This comes from @andre_banandre's analysis based on data from OpenRouter and similar platforms. OpenRouter is an aggregation platform that lets enterprises flexibly switch between models to optimize cost and performance.

Q5: What about data security? Isn't it risky to use Chinese models?

A5: A valid concern. But many Chinese models support private deployment—running on the enterprise's own servers without data leaving the company infrastructure. This mitigates data leakage concerns to some extent.

Q6: What impact does this have for Hong Kong and Taiwan?

A6: Both Hong Kong and Taiwan are key nodes in the global semiconductor and tech supply chain. The rise of Chinese AI may increase demand for local compute capacity (GPUs, data centers) and create new collaboration opportunities.

Q7: Can US AI companies maintain their lead?

A7: In top-tier research capability, US companies still lead. But in commercialization and cost-effectiveness, Chinese models are closing fast. The future landscape may be a dual-track system: "top-tier uses US, large-scale uses Chinese."

Tags: #ChineseAI #DeepSeek #AIcost #enterprise #open-source #costperformance

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Intel 14A Defect Density Is Its Best Since 22nm — Is Intel Back in the Leading-Edge Race?

One-sentence takeaway: Intel's 14A process is cutting defect density faster than any node since 22nm, and customers have moved from watching to asking about capacity — if risk production stays on track for H2 2027, it's the strongest signal yet that Intel is back in the leading-edge game. "We have not seen this performance since 22nm." When Intel CFO David Zinsner dropped that line at the Deutsche Bank 2026 technology conference, the semiconductor world took notice. 14A — Intel's first 1.4nm-class node — is backing up the company's comeback story with data, not slogans. What is 14A, and why it matters 14A is Intel's most advanced planned process node, a "1.4nm-class" technology targeting high-volume manufacturing in 2028. It packs three headline technologies: second-generation RibbonFET gate-all-around transistors, PowerDirect backside power delivery, and High-NA EUV lithography. In short, it's the most technically complex node Intel ...

Google's Antitrust Remedies Enter Deep Water: Breakup, AI Mode, and the Browser

Bottom line: The U.S. DOJ's remedies phase against Google is redefining the commercial rules of "search" — from Chrome's fate to AI distribution and the ad business, every step could reshape global tech. Google's search monopoly case has been called "the most important antitrust case of the internet era." In August 2024, a federal judge ruled Google violated antitrust law; now the remedies phase is in deep water. The DOJ's proposals include breaking up the ad business, divesting Chrome, and ending default search agreements — each step ripples through the entire tech industry. Timeline: from monopoly ruling to remedies In August 2024, the D.C. federal court ruled that Google violated the Sherman Act by paying billions annually to make Apple, Samsung, and others set Google as the default search engine. The remedies trial runs through 2026, with DOJ options including: Breaking up the ad business: Google's ad tech stack is accused of stifl...

Why Is NVIDIA Spending Billions to Buy Up America's "Dark Fiber"?

One-line conclusion: NVIDIA is reportedly spending $5–10 billion to acquire long-haul "dark fiber" networks across the United States, signaling that the AI infrastructure race is shifting from raw compute power to the networks that connect it. NVIDIA is reportedly acquiring long-haul "dark fiber" networks across the United States, with total capacity estimated at 7.6 Pbps and a price tag between $5 billion and $10 billion. The news sent optical communications stocks surging globally: Taiwan's optical module makers jumped on July 22, and three more hit the daily limit on July 23. Many now read this as the moment the AI arms race moved from "who has more GPUs" to "who owns the network." What Is Dark Fiber, and Why Buy Instead of Lease? Dark fiber refers to fiber-optic cable that has already been laid but has no transmission equipment installed and carries no optical signal . The fiber cores sit "dark" and dormant, waiting to...